Legal Opinion

Rawls v. . Henries

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Civil ACTION tried before Whedbee, J., at May Term, 1916, of Pamlico, a jury trial having been formally waived. On the facts as found by the court there was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

The land was owned by Thomas Holton, who died on or before 1878, leaving a last will and testament in which he devised the land to his wife for life, remainder to A. D. Holton, his nephew. The widow died in 1914. The plaintiff claimed the land under a deed from A. L>. Holton, devisee, executed in 1913. Defendants claimed as heirs at law of L. D. Henries, who held same under a deed from Josephus Linton and wife, Josephine, dated in June, 1879, and offered evidence tending to show that defendants and those under whom they claimed had since been in possession, asserting ownership under said deed.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Matthews v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Glisson v. . GlissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duffer v. . BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Groves v. . WareSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Wellons v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Gough v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API