Legal Opinion

Fantastic Sam's v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal by Fantastic Sam’s (Employer) and Employer’s insurer, Cincinnati Insurance Company, from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision modifying the rate of compensation payable in a supplemental agreement to Dawna Jean Kowalski (Claimant) and awarding her attorney’s fees.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 21, 1989, Claimant began working for Employer as a hair stylist. On August 21, 1989, Claimant experienced a severe allergic reaction to the use of certain hair products that caused Employer to issue a notice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kuney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth, Bureau of Worker's Compensation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Landis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. American Mutual Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. LaChina v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Port Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Jones v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Cassell Paving, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API