Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1993No. 260 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Glenn Cunningham (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) which affirmed the referee’s finding of a reasonable contest by Franklin Steel Company (employer) against the claimant’s claim. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury to his back on August 5, 1991 after which claimant immediately notified employer. Employer sent claimant to a chiropractor; however, after two visits to the chiropractor claimant requested that he be permitted to visit his treating physician, Dr. Euliano. Dr. Euliano had previously treated claimant for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Sokol v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Transamerican Office Furniture v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gillyard v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Lemansky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Pruitt v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Toy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API