Legal Opinion

Jones v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIULIANTE, Senior Judge.

Janice Jones (Claimant) petitions for review of the May 15, 2001 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting in part Claimant’s review petition and determining that a calculation of Claimant’s average weekly wage (AWW) under Section 309(c) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, rather than Section 309(e), 1 was proper. 2 The issue specifically before us is whether the Board erred in relying upon Stofa v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Florence Mining Co.), 702 A.2d 381…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. DiakatosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Chubb v. Allegheny Country ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Frank M. Sheesley Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Stofa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conyers v. New Hanover County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Area Education Agency 7 v. BauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API