Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Giovanello v. Village of Lowellville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1942No. 28448PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There are two principal subjects of inquiry, (a) the validity and force of Section 4389, General Code, with reference to the classified civil service and to the municipal ordinance quoted, and, if the statute is valid, the proper construction thereof, and (b) the relator's right to salary during the period he has been excluded from his position.

First, then, we shall consider the validity and force of the statutory provision.

The respondents claim that Section 4389, General Code, is invalid because it is violative of the civil service provision of the Constitution (Section 10, Article XV) which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Curtis v. DeCorpsOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Williams v. State Ex Rel. GribbenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. City of Cincinnati v. GambleOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Daly v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Stone v. Goolsby, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1969
  5. Hardin v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API