State Ex Rel. Daly v. City of Toledo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The ordinance here in question provides, compulsory retirement of members of the police and fire divisions at the age of 65 years. The sole question for determination is the validity of the ordinance..
We are not concerned with any question of policy; whether this ordinance is wise or unwise is not for us-to say. If the respondent city possessed the power to enact this ordinance, it is valid.
It is vigorously asserted, by relator that the respondent city was without power to legislate upon the subject of retirement, it being his claim that the* General Assembly had fixed his tenure of office…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. GambleOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Giovanello v. Village of LowellvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Huntington v. State Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Delardas v. Morgantown Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Rushford v. MeadorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Reno v. SaibiniNevada Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.