Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Daly v. City of Toledo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1943No. 29575PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The ordinance here in question provides, compulsory retirement of members of the police and fire divisions at the age of 65 years. The sole question for determination is the validity of the ordinance..

We are not concerned with any question of policy; whether this ordinance is wise or unwise is not for us-to say. If the respondent city possessed the power to enact this ordinance, it is valid.

It is vigorously asserted, by relator that the respondent city was without power to legislate upon the subject of retirement, it being his claim that the* General Assembly had fixed his tenure of office…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. GambleOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Giovanello v. Village of LowellvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Huntington v. State Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Delardas v. Morgantown Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Rushford v. MeadorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. City of Reno v. SaibiniNevada Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API