Legal Opinion

Rankin v. Newman

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1895No. 15731PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt C.

The parties differ as to the complexion of this action. Plaintiff asserts it to be “ a suit in equity by the administrator (with the will annexed) of the estate of John Levinson, deceased, against his surviving copartners for an accounting and settlement of the affairs of the, partnership” ; while defendants claim that it is “ an action to set aside on the ground of actual fraud a *604partnership settlement made by the executor of a deceased partner with the surviving partners, to have the papers executed in the matter of the settlement adjudged to be void and to be delivered up for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Johnson v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Botto v. VandamentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Rankin v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API