Botto v. Vandament
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Amador County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This cause comes here from the Superior Court of Amador County on appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff on the pleadings. The plaintiff sued for damages for the taking of water from a ditch belonging to her, and for the restitution of certain water and water privileges, and prays for a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from further using or interfering with said water or water privileges.
The defendant denied specifically the allegations of the complaint, plead the Statute of Limitations of five years, under section 319 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and as a further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Buhne v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Nudd v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Prost v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Amador County v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cuneo v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Norris v. LillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Perrin v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Stauffer v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.