Legal Opinion
City of Santa Monica v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 1964No. Civ. 28668PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
On August 20,1964, action was commenced by Tee Pee Enterprises, a corporation, doing business as The Plush Poodle, against the City of Santa Monica and certain of its officials seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, a temporary restraining order, and a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of certain of the city's gambling ordinances. The complaint filed herein alleges that plaintiff has carried on a cocktail lounge and bar business in the City of Santa Monica for many years and now desires to conduct upon its premises a game of cards, commonly called “Panguingui,” which would be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Crittenden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Golden Gate Sightseeing Tours, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Prival v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Eckl v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- 7978 CORPORATION v. PitchessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.