Legal Opinion

Golden Gate Sightseeing Tours, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1937No. Civ. 10496PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

—The plaintiff filed a complaint asking an injunction against the defendants restraining them from enforcing Ordinance No. 11.01111. The defendants filed a demurrer alleging that the complaint did not state facts sufficient. The demurrer was sustained and from the judgment thereafter entered the plaintiff has appealed.

In its brief the plaintiff makes numerous attacks on the validity of the ordinance. In the brief of the defendants they reply to the attacks so made by the plaintiff and they state rather fully an additional reply that, “The demurrer was properly sustained regardless of alleged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bueneman v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Fry v. Superior Court of Lake CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Willis v. LauridsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Glassco v. El Sereno Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Connerly v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Ass'n v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. City of Santa Monica v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API