Legal Opinion

State v. Grossman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 2001No. C8-00-459PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

This case involves application of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), to Minnesota’s patterned sex offender sentence enhancement statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.108 (2000).

Jay Grossman was convicted of, inter alia, first-degree criminal sexual conduct (fear of imminent great bodily harm) in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(c) (1998), an offense that carries a maximum sentence of 30 years’ imprisonment. Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. 2 (1998). The sentencing court enhanced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. O'MEARA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API