Legal Opinion
Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 28, 1972No. 43431PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court holding that plaintiff, Dairyland Insurance Company, hereafter Dairy-land, was not entitled to recover from defendant, Implement Dealers Insurance Company, hereafter Implement, under certain stipulated facts. We affirm the trial court.
On February 14, 1969, one Michael Lee Fahey was involved in an automobile accident while driving a car loaned to him and owned by Clarence and Alfred Fischer, doing business as Fischer Olds, a partnership. Fahey had taken his car to Fischer Olds to be repaired, and the accident-involved…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Federal Insurance Company v. PrestemonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Wyatt v. WyattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Lang v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3Cited by57 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Jenoff, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.