Smiddy v. O'Neil
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff would warrant the finding of these facts: The defendant, with his automobile which he drove, met the plaintiff by appointment at her home in Holyoke. They had been acquainted for a good many years. She had ridden with him on numerous, previous occasions and knew he was a good driver. At her request the defendant in his automobile first drove with her to Hadley and then to Westfield. On the return from Westfield to Holyoke, at a little after ten o’clock in the evemng, the defendant drove to the left of the center of the road…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- West v. PoorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Meeney v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pittsley v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Swengil v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Desroches v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- MacEachern v. StielerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.