Legal Opinion

Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1932PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These actions of tort, for damages arising out of a collision between a motor bus and an automobile, were tried with other actions brought by the same plaintiffs against the Boston, Worcester and New York Transportation Company and John J. Ward, driver of the defendant’s bus; but at the close of the evidence it was agreed that only the four cases set forth above should be submitted to the jury.

The declaration in each case was in several counts. In those in the Isaacson and Haynes, administratrix, cases there were two counts for death alleging respectively neg*381ligence and wilful, wanton or…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Aiken v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Commonwealth v. CabotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Sandler v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Stock v. FifeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Boyd v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Beitz v. HorakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API