Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MacEachern v. Stieler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiffs in these two actions seek to recover compensation for personal injuries received by them by reason of the gross negligence of the defendant while operating her automobile in which both were riding as her guests. Verdicts were returned for the plaintiffs. The only question is whether the evidence warranted a finding of gross negligence on the part of the defendant. There was testimony in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiffs to this effect: On a pleasant July afternoon, the defendant with three guests was driving for pleasure on a good macadamized road about twenty-two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connors v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Desroches v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Caldbeck v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Swistak v. ParadisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Logan v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Channon v. LynchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Hebert v. HicksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Cini v. RomeoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Castelli v. PadeniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Szemkus v. PetrilaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API