Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1917No. 8911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for damages; from Dade' superior court—Judge Tarver. March 22, 1917.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only assignment of error is that the court erred in awarding a nonsuit. No proper brief of the evidence is in the bill of exceptions or made a part of the record. What purports to be a brief of the evidence contains all the evidence in extenso, both material and immaterial, and also all the testimony which the court excluded from evidence, including objections thereto and argument of counsel thereon. The judgment of the lower court must therefore be affirmed. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6140, 6141; Cunningham v. Strom, 8 Ga.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Albany & Northern Railway Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Bunn v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Huntley Manufacturing Co. v. Nixon Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Cunningham v. StromCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Motz v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clay v. Austell School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Carnes v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API