Bunn v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Waycross — Judge Lank-ford presiding. September 23, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. This court will not undertake to consider assignments of error in a motion for a new trial which are dependent for their determination upon a consideration of the evidence, where no bona fide attempt is made to file a brief of the evidence in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code, § 6093, but instead thereof the movant files a document, approved by the trial judge, which includes the documentary and oral testimony without abridgment, as well as numerous objections to testimony, and colloquies between court and counsel. Rogers v. National Cash Register Co., 11 Ga. App. 487 (75 S.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Georgia Power Co. v. CornwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Albany & Northern Railway Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Rogers v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Lucas v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Spurlock v. Commercial Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.