Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Strom

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1910No. 2553PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Distraint; from city court of Cordele — Judge Strozior. December 22, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only valid assignment of error is that the finding of the court, without the intervention of a jury, is without any evidence to support it. No proper brief of the written and oral evidence is in the bill of exceptions or made a part of the record. What purports to be a brief is all the evidence in extenso, both material and immaterial, and also all the testimony which the court excluded from evidence; and as the only questions made depend upon a consideration of the evidence, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Civil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albany & Northern Railway Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Huntley Manufacturing Co. v. Nixon Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Motz v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mewborn v. WeitzerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Brown & Adams v. Weichselbaum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API