Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1917No. 8929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trover; from Cobb superior court — Judge Searcy presiding. April 24, 1917.. ■ '

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the plea and answer.

2. This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only as*464signment of error, other than that disposed of above, is that the court erred in awarding a nonsuit. No proper brief of the evidence is in the bill of exceptions, or made a part of the record; and the case is controlled by the ruling made in Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 20 Ga. App. 826 (93 S. E. 511). See also Civil Code (1910), §§ 6140, 6141; Crumbley v. Brooke, 135 Ga. 723 (70 S. E. 655); Cunningham v. Strom, 8 Ga. App. 87 (68 S. E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crumbley v. BrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Cunningham v. StromCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eller v. Roan Lamb IncSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Eller v. Roan & Lamb Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API