Legal Opinion

Huntley Manufacturing Co. v. Nixon Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1909No. 1357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, from Eichmond superior court — Judge Hammond. • July 27, 1908.

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, O. J.

There is no brief of the evidence in this ease, as required by the Civil Code, §§5484, 5488. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists of a lengthy correspondence between the parties, the many letters being given in full, with no attempt to brief their contents. This court can not undertake to winnow the wheat from the chaff, or separate the material from the immaterial in the evidence. This work can be better done by the attorneys; and unless the statute is complied with in this respect, an affirmance must result, where the questions to *47be decided, depend upon a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Harris & Mitchell v. McArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Hirsch & Co. v. Dozier Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mewborn v. WeitzerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Cunningham v. StromCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Oconee Oil Refining Co. v. Planters Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Tidwell v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Lanham v. PresleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API