Ferguson Fruit & Land Co v. Goodding
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
BRINCK, Commissioner.
Counsel for respondents have presented a petition for rehearing accompanied by a brief urging that the opinion heretofore filed has failed to follow the precedents established by this court and by the supreme court of California.
They first state that the doctrine of Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co., 158 Cal. 567, 112 Pac. 454, cited in the original opinion herein to the point that the Governor’s proclamation is a necessary condition precedent to the forfeiture of a corporation’s charter for nonpayment of license fee, has been repudiated by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.