Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. Curry
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate prayed to be-directed against the Secretary of State of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Mandamus prayed to be directed against Charles F. Curry, secretary of state of the state of California.
This is an original proceeding in mandate. The petition shows the following to be the material facts: Plaintiff is; a domestic corporation formed for .purposes of profit, whose certificate of incorporation was issued August 12, 1899. By its articles of incorporation, its number of directors is fixed at five. On or about October 15, 1908, a majority of the stockholders thereof duly met and executed and acknowledged a certificate, decreasing the number of directors from five to-three, which,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Owners of Lands v. People ex rel. StookeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- King v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Brunton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Selowsky v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.