Legal Opinion

Reddell v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 1999No. 91719Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRETT, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant, Aan Reddell, was terminated from his employment with the Oklahoma Ordinance Works Authority. He filed for unemployment benefits. OESC denied the claim. Appellant appealed to the Board of Review which denied benefits, finding he was discharged for misconduct and was, therefore, disqualified. Appellant appealed to the district court. The district court affirmed, and Appellant appealed to the Supreme Court. See appeal number 89,004. The appeal was assigned to the Court of Civil Appeals, Division II, which held the Board’s denial of benefits was not supported…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API