Legal Opinion

Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1996No. 85174PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOPLIN, Judge:

Appellant The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company (Employer) seeks review of the trial court’s order affirming the decision of the Appellee Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC) to allow unemployment compensation benefits to Appellee Clentis R. McCarroll (Claimant). In this appeal, Employer asserts error of both law and fact in allowing unemployment benefits to Claimant after Claimant voluntarily quit work upon acceptance of Employer’s offer of enhanced early retirement benefits, i.e., retirement benefits in excess of those which Claimant was entitled and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. STEINBERG VISION ASSOCIATES v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Toothaker v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  4. Denby v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In Re the Discharge of WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Childress v. MUZZLEWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wright & Edwards v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Evans v. OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'NCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Moore v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. Reddell v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API