Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Tulsa County Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1995No. 82903PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

This is an original action in this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to the Tulsa County Election Board. The Petitioner was a candidate for School Board whose name had been removed from the ballot by the Election Board. We issued the writ and allowed the candidate’s name to remain on the ballot, advising that an opinion would follow. We now vacate the writ and uphold the action of the Election Board.

Mark Sharp filed as a candidate for office on the School Board of the Jenks Independent School District No. 5. No other individual filed for the seat. After the filing period ended…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Taylor v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. Upton v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API