Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Mayer
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1951No. Civ. 4174PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendant and respondent owned the Mayer Stock Farm in Riverside County. On September 30, 1947, one Myron S. Fox, business manager for defendant, signed and delivered to plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, the following letter:
“Dear Frank:
“The price on the Mayer Stock Farm is $600,000. It consists of 504% acres of irrigated land together with buildings, improvements and attendant equipment.
“We will pay you a realty commission of 5 per cent if you can effect a sale.” (Italics ours.)
Plaintiff’s evidence shows that he unsuccessfully endeavored to interest various persons in the purchase of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bishop v. NorellArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Nelson v. MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954