Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Mayer
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1954No. Civ. 4751PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered pursuant to a directed verdict, the action being one to recover a real estate broker’s commission. The evidence presented by plaintiff is substantially the same' as that in a former trial of the action in which a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff H. Frank Nelson. A new trial was granted in that action and on appeal the order granting it was affirmed by this court. (Nelson v. Mayer, 101 Cal.App. 2d 733 [226 P.2d 20].)
Plaintiff’s Evidence
Defendant Louis B. Mayer, owner of a stock farm in Riverside County, authorized his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Gish v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morrow v. BargerNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Frederick May & Company v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Tetrick v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Total Coverage, Inc. v. Cendant Settlement Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Wilson v. RoppoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.