Legal Opinion

Weinacht Et Ux. v. Bower

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiffs, who are residents and tax-

payers in a part of Marion county having no high school, challenge for themselves and others similarly situated the constitutionality of the county high school tuition fund law (§§35-4101 to. 35-4113, Oregon Code 1930) and seek to enjoin the collection of a special tax levied upon their property under and by virtue of such law. The circuit court, upon refusal of the plaintiffs further to plead after demurrer to their complaint had been sustained, dismissed the suit.

The purpose and object of the law under attack is to offer high school education to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paulson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. First State Bank v. Kendall Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dant & Russell, Inc. v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Johnson v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Smith v. BarnardOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API