Legal Opinion

Dant & Russell, Inc. v. Pierce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Under this state of the record, the only question presented, aside from that of jurisdiction, is whether the facts alleged constitute a cause of suit. The demurrer admitted the truth of all of the material allegations of the cause to which it was interposed and, if such were sufficient, the motion for judgment upon the pleadings was properly allowed: Section 79, Or. L.; Owen et al. v. Leber et al., 112 Or. 136 (228 Pac. 927).

The second cause of suit, in substance and so far as material herein, alleges that plaintiff filed a duly verified return of its income for the year 1923, upon the forms…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Winkleman v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. City of Woodburn v. DomogallaOregon Tax Court · 1963
  5. Weinacht Et Ux. v. BowerOregon Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API