Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barnard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This suit was commenced in 1931 to determine- the constitutionality of the County High School Fund law, codified as section 35-4001 to section 35-4008, inclusive, Oregon Code 1930. Plaintiffs, who are residents and taxpayers respectively of school district No. 4 (Eugene), school district No. 45 (Cottage Grove), school district No. 69 (Junction City), and school district No. 19 (Springfield), all in Lane county, Oregon, seek to enjoin the defendant officials from acting under and pursuant to this law on the ground that it violates the rule of uniform assessment and taxation as provided by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irvin v. GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Slocomb v. Cameron Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. High School District No. 137 v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. City of Dallas v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Peterson v. HancockNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. School District No. 16-R v. McCormmachOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API