Legal Opinion

Swan v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover for the loss of services of his wife alleged to have been injured in the defendant’s department store.

The defendant moves for judgment upon the complaint and upon an affidavit which tends to show that the claim set forth in the complaint has been satisfied. The plaintiff has not filed any affidavit in opposition to the motion.

The affidavit sets forth that Emily Swan, the wife of the plaintiff, was, at the time she received the injuries complained of, an employee of the defendant and that such injuries were received in the course of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Brooks v. . SchwerinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Baker's Executors v. KilgoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Ryder v. . HulseNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Wright v. Action Vending Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API