Legal Opinion
Danek v. Hommer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 9, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 N.J. Super. 607 (1951)
82 A.2d 659
JOHN DANEK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JULIUS J. HOMMER AND KATHERYN HOMMER, PARTNERS t/a HOMMER TOOL & MFG. CO., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS,
v.
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.
Decided July 9, 1951.
Mr. Meyer M. Semel, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. McGlynn, Weintraub & Stein (Mr. Joseph Weintraub, appearing), attorneys for defendants and third-party plaintiffs.
Messrs. Shaw, Hughes & Pindar (Mr. Robert Shaw, appearing),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- United States Casualty Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Underwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Stepnowski v. Specific Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Ekalo v. Constructive Serv. Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.