Legal Opinion

Hale v. Apfel

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 14, 1998No. 97-3263-CV-S-BCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE APPEALS COUNCIL

LARSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Barbara Hale seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security reallocating plaintiffs 1 and her husband’s income for the years 1992, 1993, and 1994. Plaintiff argues that the Appeals Council erred in finding that she earned only $5.00 per hour during 1992, 1993 and 1994, and that she is entitled to an allocation of earnings in accordance with the income listed on her income tax returns. I find that (1) there is no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Gavin v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (SS) Lockhart v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Chadwick v. Vamco Ltd, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
  3. Integon National Insurance Company v. GarbuzovDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Quidel Corporation v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  5. Vaughn v. ParkerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API