Legal Opinion

Quidel Corporation v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 27, 2019No. 3:16-cv-03059Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 QUIDEL CORPORATION, Case No. 16-cv-3059-BAS-AGS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 12 PLAINTIFF’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S 13 v. COUNTERCLAIMS 14 SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS [ECF No. 141] USA, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Quidel Corporation filed a two-part Motion seeking to strike in part 19 and/or dismiss in part Defendant Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.’s 20 counterclaims. The Court held oral argument on the Motion on September 17, 2019. 21 For the reasons discussed below, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API