Steadman v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
In administrative proceedings, the Securities and Exchange Commission applies a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard of proof in determining whether the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws have been violated. The question presented is whether such violations must be proved by clear and convincing evidence rather than by a preponderance of the evidence.
I
In June 1971, the Commission initiated a disciplinary proceeding against petitioner and certain of his wholly owned companies. The proceeding against petitioner was brought pursuant to § 9 (b) of the Investment Company Act of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by319 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.