Legal Opinion

SSM Investments v. Siemers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1980No. 50087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

This action was brought by plaintiff in the Aitkin County District Court to determine adverse claims to a 100-foot strip of land bordering Mille Lacs Lake. The trial court held that plaintiff had failed to establish its claim and the heirs at law of Kenneth and Hazel Siemers own the land in dispute. We reverse.

To establish title by adverse possession, a disseizor must show, by clear and convincing evidence, an actual, open, hostile, continuous, and exclusive possession for the requisite period of time which, under Minn.Stat. § 541.02 (1978), is fifteen years. Ehle v. Prosser,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Ennis v. StanleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Schmidt v. MarschelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Curran v. MountAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Singer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API