Legal Opinion

Curran v. Mount

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1982No. 6139PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This appeal arises from a quiet title action involving claims of fraud and adverse possession. The property in dispute is a part of Block 95, Original Townsite of Fairbanks. A diagram of the area is set out below.

The record owner of Lots 6, 7A and 7B is appellant, The Parrish Company, successor in interest to appellants Mary Jane Curran and Estate of Thomas E. Curran, Jr. (All of the appellants will hereafter be referred to as “Curran”).

From the mid-1980s to 1978, Simeon Bu-lavski was the record owner of Lot 8. In 1973, appellees James and Helen Mount purchased a parcel…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Van Valkenburgh v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Saxton v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Combe v. Warren's Family Drive-Inns, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Vezey v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API