Legal Opinion
Gabler v. Fedoruk
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 14, 2008No. A08-0517PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
This appeal regarding a dispute between two landowners over the location of their common boundary — with appellants Richard and Patricia Fredricks and their predecessor in interest, Jack Gabler, on one side of the boundary, and respondents Elizabeth and Stanley Fedoruk on the other — requires us to decide whether the district court may, in its discretion, refuse to give legal effect to a boundary that it has expressly found to exist by practical location. We must also decide whether the district court may order the landowners on one side of the boundary to pay the owners on…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Beardsley v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- In Re the Estate of BargSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Miller v. HennenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slindee v. Fritch Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re Minnwest Bank Litigation Concerning Real Property in Otsego, Minnesota, Minnwest Bank v. RTB, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Gabler v. FedorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008