Legal Opinion

Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1958No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

Plaintiff instituted an action in trespass to recover for the death of her husband which allegedly resulted from the negligence of his defendant employer, Mesta Machine Company. The court below sustained the defendant’s preliminary objections to the plaintiff’s complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy was under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and, accordingly, dismissed the complaint.

The decedent, regularly employed as a steel chipper in the Roll Shop of defendant’s plant, on February 29, 1956, (the date of his death), was scheduled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Billo v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Hornetz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Flood v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Baur v. Mesta MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Savage v. Jefferson Medical College HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Vogel v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Bayless v. Philadelphia National League ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API