Legal Opinion

Anstine v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1941No. Appeals, 38 and 39PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiffs, parents, of John Brindle Anstine, a minor, in their own right and in his behalf,, brought this action in trespass to recover compensation for damages sustained as a result of a collision between a train, owned and operated by defendant company, and an automobile in which the minor was a guest passenger. Harry R. Davis, Jr., driver of the automobile, and his father, Harry R.: Davis, the owner, . Were joined as defendants with the railroad company, but at the close of plaintiffs’. case, a compulsory nonsuit as to Davis, Sr., was granted. After verdicts in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Ealy v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Newhard v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Fillmore v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Irwin Savings & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API