Anstine v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
Plaintiffs, parents, of John Brindle Anstine, a minor, in their own right and in his behalf,, brought this action in trespass to recover compensation for damages sustained as a result of a collision between a train, owned and operated by defendant company, and an automobile in which the minor was a guest passenger. Harry R. Davis, Jr., driver of the automobile, and his father, Harry R.: Davis, the owner, . Were joined as defendants with the railroad company, but at the close of plaintiffs’. case, a compulsory nonsuit as to Davis, Sr., was granted. After verdicts in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Ealy v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Newhard v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Wilson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Fillmore v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Irwin Savings & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.