Legal Opinion

Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1931No. Appeal, 6PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

In the Town of Natrona the defendant company operates a railroad running east and west. There are three tracks, the northern, or westbound track; the middle, or eastbound track, on which the accident giving rise to this case occurred; and the southern, which is a siding. Philadelphia Avenue, 16 or 18 feet wide and running north and south, crosses these tracks. At about 3:30 p. m., January 12, 1929, one J. A. Wallace, with plaintiff’s decedent, Carl Haller, in his car as a guest, drove his car south toward this crossing and stopped within 15 feet of the nearest rail…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Zotter v. Lehigh Talley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Anspach v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Keiser v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Knox v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Valles v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Ealy v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API