Legal Opinion

In Re Bloom

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1977No. S.F. 23527PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar that Martin Bloom be disciplined.

Bloom, a 34-year-old attorney admitted to practice in 1972, pleaded guilty in 1975 to solicitation to commit bribery (Pen. Code, § 653f). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on two years’ probation. In 1976 the court terminated his probation after only one year, deemed the offense a misdemeanor, permitted him to withdraw his guilty plea, and dismissed the information (Pen. Code, § 1203.4).

In the meantime, by an order which became…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Yapp v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Coviello v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rosenthal v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re SeveroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API