In Re Bloom
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar that Martin Bloom be disciplined.
Bloom, a 34-year-old attorney admitted to practice in 1972, pleaded guilty in 1975 to solicitation to commit bribery (Pen. Code, § 653f). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on two years’ probation. In 1976 the court terminated his probation after only one year, deemed the offense a misdemeanor, permitted him to withdraw his guilty plea, and dismissed the information (Pen. Code, § 1203.4).
In the meantime, by an order which became…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Yapp v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Coviello v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Rosenthal v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re SeveroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.