City of New York v. Taliaferrow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
This case arises out of allegations that the appellants used the subject premises for purposes of prostitution. As a result of a prior action commenced by the City of New York, a consent judgment was entered on May 22, 1985, permanently enjoining the defendant Taliaferrow from using, maintaining or permitting the use of the subject premises for the purposes of prostitution or for any other nuisance and directing that the premises be sold within six months to a new owner who would not use the premises for prostitution.
Thereafter, the City of New York commenced the instant action, alleging,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lyke v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- State v. Schenectady Chemicals, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of New York v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- City of New York v. AndrewsNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- City of New York v. 924 Columbus AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.