Legal Opinion
City of New York v. 924 Columbus Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nardelli, J.
The City Council has determined that the use of property in flagrant violation of the laws relating to controlled substances and dangerous drugs interferes with the "quality of life” and the community environment, besides endangering property values and the public health, safety and welfare of the public, and therefore, enacted the "Nuisance Abatement Law” (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-701). This action deals with the application of this law and the burden of proof required of the City in obtaining relief, as well as the burden of defendants in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of New York v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- City of New York v. TaliaferrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MolnarNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- City of New York v. MorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- City of New York v. PhilipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- City of New York v. MorNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- City of New York v. PhilipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999