Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1990PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered February 28, 1989, which granted the motion of the plaintiff City of New York for an order pursuant to CPLR 6301 and Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-707 preliminarily enjoining defendants from the use and occu*652pancy of the first-floor area of the premises located at 702-04 Amsterdam Avenue in Manhattan, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff city commenced this action and sought the preliminary closing order under section 7-701 et seq. of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (Nuisance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. City of New York v. Bilynn Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. City of New York v. TaliaferrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cho Ex Rel. Situated v. City of N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. City of Rochester v. Premises Located at 10-12 South Washington StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of New York v. DanaNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of New York v. 924 Columbus AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. City of New York v. Partnership 91, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API