Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1972No. 7217SC113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant raises two questions on appeal to this Court:

1. Did the trial court err in failing to quash the warrant on the grounds that it did not allege all the essential elements of the offense for which the defendant was tried and convicted?

2. Did the trial court commit error in admitting a record of the suspension of defendant’s driver’s license where the suspension was imposed without a hearing?

The defendant contends that the warrant on which he was tried was fatally defective because it failed to allege that defendant was driving on a “public” highway.

The warrant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. . SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BoomerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API