Legal Opinion

Joyner v. Garrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 30, 1971No. 75PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Petitioner “prays” this Court to rescind the action of the Department and to declare his license “in good standing as it pertains to this arrest.” He contends that he is entitled to this relief because (1) he was denied the right to cross-examine Patrolman Spainhour at the administrative hearing; (2) the hearing officer did not find that he wilfully failed to submit to the chemical test, and therefore his findings did not sustain the Department’s order of revocation; (3) Judge Clark erred in ruling that the burden of proof is on petitioner; and (4) the evidence was insufficient…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Gottschalk v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. State v. StarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Prichard v. BattleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Dragan v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Henry v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API