Legal Opinion

State v. . Sauls

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1925PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Though punishable by tbe ecclesiastical courts of England as an offense against good morals, incest was not indictable at common law. It was made a felony in this State by tbe act of 1879. C. S., 4337, 4338; S. v. Keesler, 78 N. C., 469; S. v. Gutshall, 109 N. C., 764, 774; S. v. Brittain, 117 N. C., 783. As it is of statutory origin an indictment therefor must charge a crime substantially within tbe terms of tbe statute. Tbe act denounced as a felony is carnal intercourse between grandparent and grandchild, parent and child, and brother and sister of tbe half or whole blood. Sec. 4337. Tbe…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. S. v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. . O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. . HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. State v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API