State v. Boomer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendants have brought forward their sixth, seventh, and ninth assignments of error in three arguments. In the first of these they argue that the trial court erred in denying their motion for nonsuit as to felony and misdemeanor larceny; in the second they maintain that there was insufficient evidence to submit an issue of felony larceny to the jury; and in the third they contend that there was insufficient evidence to support a verdict of guilty of felony larceny. These three variously worded assignments of error present but one question — whether the State’s evidence was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ErlewineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. . DelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- State v. . CaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FronebergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. MandinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Matter of PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.