Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1971No. 7114SC220PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error are lost in the confusion of the Record on Appeal which was filed in this case. Counsel could have, and should have, prepared the Record on Appeal to assist this Court in following his contentions and arguments, but he has thrown the record haphazardly together with little semblance of continuity. Our Rule 19(a) clearly provides that the Record on Appeal shall set forth the proceedings in the case in the order of the time in which they occurred. It is true that appellate counsel in this case is court-appointed, but that does not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. HairrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Flood v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. NolesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Matter of ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Matter of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API